Capability · Platform delivery

A platform is finished when a rehearsal passes, not when the feature list is ticked

PEPM joins pre-investment, portfolio, post-investment and disclosure into one flow with no manual hand-offs. Approval logic follows your committee rules; nineteen business systems read one data dictionary. At go-live we accept two things: UAT pass rate and a filing rehearsal run on live definitions.

8–16 week standard rangePublic cloud, private cloud or isolated intranet14,000+ funds covered (managed basis)Standard, Advanced and Professional editionsDingTalk, Feishu, WeCom and WeChat integrations

Position

Customisation changes approval logic, not the colour of the screens

High customisability means one thing here: approval and process flows are adjusted to the client’s rules. How many steps sit between screening and committee, whether a decision can be returned, who may write to a valuation field, whether USD and RMB vehicles follow the same route — your policy decides these, not the edition you bought.

The technical commitment is equally narrow: data moves end to end without breakpoints. Projects, funds, entities, valuations and filings reference each other under one dictionary, so nobody exports three spreadsheets at month end and stitches them together.

An investment platform delivered without a data dictionary degrades into manual reconciliation in its first filing season: the system stores fields, the report needs definitions, and overtime covers the gap. That is why platform delivery is step two, after a signed blueprint.Catalpa delivery method

Six steps from signed artefacts to go-live

The inputs are the signed dictionary and swimlane map from the blueprint. Each step produces a reviewable record; we do not let a later step start before the previous one closes.

  1. Convert signed definitions into configuration

    Field by field we check source and refresh frequency, then turn swimlane nodes into configurable workflow items. Output: configuration list and work-breakdown structure.

  2. Build approval and committee flows to your rules

    Screening, diligence, committee, closing and exit levels, co-signing and return paths are rewritten from your policy. Clients do not adapt to our defaults. Output: workflow baseline.

  3. Set three-tier permissions: function, row, field

    Visibility is cut by role and by entity; valuation, cost and LP contact fields carry separate read-write rights. Output: role-to-field permission matrix.

  4. Cleanse and migrate legacy records

    Historic projects, funds and entities are de-duplicated against the dictionary; unmappable items go on an exception list for the business to decide. Output: migration scope and per-table reconciliation.

  5. Open integrations and portals

    Mobile access through DingTalk, Feishu, WeCom and WeChat; LP and GP portals and the encrypted document service open per disclosure audience under the same permission model. Output: integration list and joint-test log.

  6. Run UAT and a filing rehearsal, then switch over

    The business writes the test cases, we execute them. One consolidated filing is produced with live definitions before cutover, and a parallel period follows. Output: UAT report and rehearsal record.

Artefacts, duration, acceptance

8–16 weeks is the standard implementation range, counted from agreement of the work-breakdown structure. Multi-line groups are split into phases rather than compressed.

ArtefactTypical durationAcceptance method
Workflow engine: approval, committee, return pathsWithin 8–16 weeksNode-by-node walk-through against policy; baseline signed
Legacy migration with per-table reconciliationWithin 8–16 weeksOpening and closing counts and key amounts agree; exceptions closed
Permission matrix (function, row, field)Within 8–16 weeksRole sampling plus privilege-escalation cases that must fail
Mobile and IM integrationsWithin 8–16 weeksJoint-test log; approvals complete on mobile end to end
LP and GP portals, disclosure templatesWithin 8–16 weeksTrial dispatch per audience; LP confirms visibility
UAT suite and filing rehearsalBefore go-liveAgreed pass rate plus one live filing produced from the platform

Hand-over pack

Four records constitute the go-live file

Workflow baseline, migration reconciliation, permission matrix, UAT and rehearsal record. These four are what we re-read at quarterly review, and what you negotiate extension budgets against.

  • Baseline diffable on rollback
  • Reconciliation kept per table
  • Escalation cases retained
Delivery & operations

Capability base

Three investment stages, three cross-cutting layers

The lists follow our published product scope. Every item maps to a configurable node and a set of fields today, not to a roadmap promise.

Pre-investment

Deal sourcing, screening, diligence, committee

The project pool keeps origin and follow-up history; diligence files attach to one entity record, and committee packs read from the same data.

  • Deal sourcing
  • Screening
  • Diligence
  • Committee support

Portfolio

Dilution modelling, data capture, cross-border rules

Multi-round dilution is computed rather than retyped; closing data lands straight in the post-investment ledger, with USD-fund cross-border reporting on the same source.

  • Dilution calculation
  • Data capture
  • USD fund compliance

Post-investment

News monitoring, KPI alerts, valuation, exit

Portfolio and sub-fund indicators update monthly against thresholds; valuation and exit models consume the same post-investment records.

  • News monitoring
  • KPI alerts
  • Asset valuation
  • Exit management

Cross-cutting

Mobile and external integration

One experience across DingTalk, Feishu, WeCom and WeChat; LP and GP portals sit inside the same permission system.

  • Approvals on mobile
  • LP / GP portals

PEPM module names, as published

The rebrand keeps the PEPM name. Modules open singly or combine into one investment chain, always sharing the same dictionary.

DealFlow project poolPortfolio ManagementVDR data-room documentsCorporate data collection and reportingLP portalFund of funds (FOF)FA / investment bankingWealth managementStandard / Advanced / Professional

Nineteen business systems, alone or in combination

Names follow the published product series on pepm.com.cn. Consolidation and filing scenarios read one dictionary, so definitions stop drifting.

PE/VC investmentGuidance fund / FOF operationsInvestment bankingFinancial holding groupInvestor relationsManager portalWealth managementReal-estate fundDebt trading and issuanceInfrastructure investmentAMC operationsREITsOA collaborationDistressed assetsSOE online supervisionFamily officePortfolio and fund risk monitoringFundraising and LP reporting (encrypted documents)AI desktop behaviourMicro-lending

Deployment

Three hosting modes, one code baseline

Public cloud, private cloud and an isolated intranet change where the software runs, not what it does. Fields, workflows, permissions and filing outlets stay identical, so a move to intranet needs no reconfiguration and no dropped module. On intranet, data leaves no outbound path and operational actions are logged to the standard your locality requires.

  • Public cloud: fast to open
  • Private cloud: you operate
  • Intranet: no egress
Security & localised IT

Edition fit

Choose the edition by managed objects and filing load

Standard covers one business line across the investment chain. Advanced adds fund-of-funds look-through and external disclosure. Professional serves multi-line groups and online supervision. The difference is measured in managed objects, filing outlets and permission tiers, not in interface polish.

  • Managed-object count
  • Filing outlets
  • Permission tiers
Reading on selection

Evidence

Which four numbers show the build worked

Post-go-live value is not measured by satisfaction. Our client-impact pages give five anonymised settings and four acceptance definitions — filing cycle, manual-reconciliation hours, definition-consistency rate and alert confirmation rate — signed at blueprint stage and recalculated at acceptance.

Acceptance definitions

Who should not buy this

Any institution that wants to skip the data dictionary: workflow configuration then makes definitional decisions on your behalf, and the bill arrives in the first filing season. Anyone looking for a licensed service — asset management, fundraising or investment advice: Catalpa supplies software and consulting only, and does not take on duties that require a financial licence.

A single-fund GP under fifteen people, or a standard-edition buyer with no definition maintenance, should also wait.

Questions procurement teams ask us

These answers match our contract terms and acceptance method, so they can go into an approval note unchanged.

Why do implementation schedules so often collapse into three months?
Legacy cleansing and UAT are what get compressed. Eight to sixteen weeks is the standard range from agreement of the work-breakdown structure; we trade that time for per-table reconciliation and a live filing rehearsal instead of a good demo on go-live day.
Can we start with post-investment and filings only?
Yes, and it is the usual first phase of a roadmap. Project and fund master data still follow the dictionary, so screening and diligence attach later without rebuilding the ledger.
How do you migrate from an existing system?
Table by table against the dictionary: entities and funds de-duplicated first, then transactions and valuation history. Anything unmappable becomes an exception line for the business to settle. You receive a migration scope note and per-table reconciliation, not the words "migration complete".
Where does look-through data on sub-funds come from?
Two sources: sub-funds report through the corporate data collection and reporting templates, and portfolio-company figures enter the same definitional table through statement extraction. The FOF module joins both into one investment and disclosure view.
Does an intranet deployment lose functionality?
No. All three modes run one code baseline; what differs is the operating location and who operates it. Mobile access follows your network policy, and the joint-test outcome is recorded in the integration list.
Can we change workflows ourselves afterwards?
Approval levels, form fields and filing templates sit with your administrators inside the permission model. Anything touching definitions goes through the metric-change process, so configuration never runs ahead of the dictionary.

Next step

Bring one live filing template and we will walk the configuration

We run your approval levels end to end in front of you, separate what is configurable from what needs the dictionary first, and set out phasing across the 8–16 week range.