01
State-owned capital & guidance funds
Online supervision, look-through holdings, fund-of-funds lifecycle
CATALPA · Asset management digitalisation
In most managers, funds, deals, holdings and valuations live across four spreadsheets and three departments. Over ten years and more than 500 institutions we have converged the breaks between pre-investment, portfolio, post-investment and disclosure into one ledger that survives a supervisory filing, an investment committee and an LP question in the same week.
Who we are
Catalpa is the brand under which Suzhou Zichuan Information Technology Co., Ltd. has worked since 2016 on financial-sector systems, extending into multi-industry digitalisation. The founding team came from Yuanhe Holdings, Founder Technology and Tencent — people who had run deals before writing software, which is why we treat the maintenance of definitions, not the feature list, as the real failure mode.
We do not sell a platform story. Three deliverables carry the engagement: a data dictionary signed by business, risk and finance; a process engine reconfigured to your investment-committee logic; and a response time written into the contract.
10+
Years in asset management systems
500+
Institutions served
14,000+
Funds covered (managed basis)
5.6RMB tn+
Assets covered (managed basis)
A provincial SOE group answering to a supervisory filing office and a market GP measured on DPI need opposite data constraints. Establish which one you are before evaluating any system.
01
Online supervision, look-through holdings, fund-of-funds lifecycle
02
One data spine from deal flow to exit
03
Lending, factoring, leasing, AMC and distressed assets on one control plane
04
Asset ledger from feasibility to O&M for solar, wind and storage
05
Multi-currency portfolios, LP reporting, succession disclosure
We commit only to what can be accepted against: blueprint, data dictionary, process configuration, metric definitions, permission model, response times. Each appears in the work-breakdown structure.
01
Assessment, target operating model, phased roadmap, business case
02
PEPM across pre-investment, portfolio, post-investment and portals
03
Report OCR, indicator judgement, behaviour monitoring, effort costing
04
Data dictionary, consistent definitions, valuation and disclosure metrics
05
Field-level permissions, encrypted chain, full Xinchuang stack
06
Implementation method, migration, enablement, 24/7 response
How we deliver
Most failed implementations cut the first incision at "install the system" rather than "settle the definitions". Our first two steps contain no code.
01 · 2–3 weeks
Interviews across business, risk and finance; a map of data flows and where they break.
02 · 3–4 weeks
Process, field ownership and metric definitions agreed and signed by three functions.
03 · 8–16 weeks
PEPM configured to your approval logic; legacy data cleansed and migrated.
04 · Ongoing
One supervised outlet for external filings; DingTalk, Feishu, WeCom and LP/GP portals.
05 · Long term
One year of free service after acceptance, 24/7 response, issue located within an hour.
AI & agents
The company reports the first AI-agent investment-management system in the sector. The judgement was in scene selection: report extraction, indicator assessment, behaviour logging and effort costing all have objectively checkable answers, so the benefit is measurable on day one. "AI decides the investment" cannot be verified, and should not be sold.
Every AI module therefore sits inside an existing process node and emits reviewable structured fields — not a chat box.
Multi-format extraction puts portfolio-company and sub-fund reporting into one definitional table.
Custom indicators with 18 warning metrics recalculated daily and retained for audit.
Monitoring of sensitive operations, meeting compliance-evidence needs in lending and quasi-financial work.
Automatic time capture makes deal-team cost measurable for the first time.
The figures below are customer-coverage counts from 2023–2025 third-party rankings: how many ranked institutions run PEPM. Rankings are re-cut annually and positions move; this is not a claim about current standing or outcomes.
| Ranking | Coverage | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Zero2IPO China VC Top 100 | 24 / 100 | Ranked institutions running PEPM |
| ChinaVenture Top 50+ | Covered | System adoption among leading market managers |
| State-owned capital Top 50 | 17 / 50 | Provincial, municipal and district platforms |
| Best exit institutions Top 10 | Covered | Shared source for exit modelling and post-investment data |
| Guidance funds & provincial FOF | 30%+ SOE share | Company-disclosed basis; leading among central-province SOEs |
Names are drawn from the company’s public sites. Listing order carries no meaning about scale or precedence.
Case pages are anonymised by default; named clients require written authorisation.
A weak corner surfaces in year two. A feature-rich platform with no data dictionary becomes manual reconciliation the first time a supervisory filing is due.
01
Highly customisable; approval flows adjusted to your committee rules; public cloud, private cloud or isolated intranet; no breakpoints in end-to-end data flow.
02
Data-dictionary driven with user-defined fields; AES-256 at rest with TLS 1.3 in transit; three-tier permissions at function, row and field level.
03
24/7 emergency response, issue located within one hour, one year free after acceptance, supported from 15 offices.
04
Experience across 14,000+ funds on platform, and fluency in the language of SOE groups, guidance funds, market GPs, quasi-financial lenders and energy assets.
We will tell you not to buy: a single-fund GP under fifteen people is better served by spreadsheets and a shared drive; a budget that covers the standard edition with no data-governance headcount will decay within two years; and a request to replace investment judgement with automation — AI should compress the time spent gathering evidence and calculating, not the time spent being accountable.
Latest thinking
Method and judgement from live engagements, for use while you shortlist and redesign.
Feature lists converge; field ownership, reporting exits and metric formulas do not. Four decisions, a meeting checklist, three cases to avoid.
A post-investment metric survives only when numerator and denominator come from objects already in the system. How to sort them, and what to do with the rest.
Provincial SOE supervision platforms stall on build order: entity ledger, holdings, metric definitions, reporting mapping, dashboards last.
Get started
45 minutes with one sector advisor and one architect. We walk pre-investment through disclosure, mark the breaks, and return a phased route with a budget band.